In these circumstances, would it not be sheer fantasy to desire the establishment in China of a capitalist society under bourgeois dictatorship after the defeat of imperialism and feudalism?
Mandarin
办农会的人对农民说：“你们打轿子，反倒替阔人省了钱，轿工要失业，岂非害了自己？”农民们想清了，出了新法子，就是大涨轿工价，以此惩富人。
辦農會的人對農民説：“你們打轎子，反倒替闊人省了錢，轎工要失業，豈非害了自己？”農民們想清了，出了新法子，就是大漲轎工價，以此懲富人。
bàn nóng huì de rén duì nóng mín shuō ： “ nǐ men dǎ jiào zi ， fǎn dào tì kuò rén shěng le qián ， jiào gōng yào shī yè ， qǐ fēi hài le zì jǐ ？ ” nóng mín men xiǎng qīng le ， chū le xīn fǎ zi ， jiù shì dà zhǎng jiào gōng jià ， yǐ cǐ chéng fù rén ．
Association officials tell the peasants, “If you smash the chairs, you only save the rich money and lose the carriers their jobs. Will that not hurt our own people?” Seeing the point, the peasants have worked out a new tactic – considerably to increase the fares charged by the chair carriers so as to penalize the rich.
How do we justify the encouragement of heroic sacrifice in war? Does it not contradict "self-preservation"? No, it does not; sacrifice and self-preservation are both opposite and complementary to each other.
Is it not, therefore, in the highest degree absurd to clamour for communism to be "folded up" on the ground that the Communist Party's minimum programme is in basic agreement with the political tenets of the Three People's Principles?